Alex O’Brien
Prof. Schranck
Writ 2
24 August 2016
Unit 2 PB2: Conventionality in the Scientific Academic Genre
Conventionality is the universal constant that strings all genres together while making each one distinct. And like all genres, academia contains several key conventions meant to obtain certain responses from specific audiences. In the previous PB, a few commonly-found conventions of academic genres in the scientific discipline were covered in two scientific journal articles with a similar topic. In addition, and as previously discussed, scientific conventions usually seek a specific kind of response among audiences more specialized in the respective field. In this PB, the functions of a third article’s (in the same genre) conventions of an introductory abstract, academic language and experimental study will be explored in greater detail, along with their rhetorical usages.
The abstract serves as a brief summary of the paper (in this case, the scientific article) written for the reader(s), and provides the essential points of a study, so that the audience may gain a ‘feel’ for the work. Typically, the abstract acts similarly to a table of contents, and written so that readers do not have to read the article’s entirety. For audience members who only wish to gain a gist of the scientific content, the abstract simply serves as a shortened summary of the article. In the third article, titled, “An epigenetic clock analysis of race/ethnicity, sex, and coronary heart disease,” “mortality rates and incidence of cardio-metabolic disease…” are compared and contrasted among many individuals of different ethnic backgrounds, using “[epigenetic] biomarkers of aging…” along with samples of test subjects’ saliva and blood (GenomeBiology). The excerpt just cited comes from the background section of the abstract, and, as just demonstrated, one can clearly get the main idea of the entire article just from this excerpt, which furthers the point that the abstract’s function lies not only to those willing to read on, but to the casual observer who does not need to be invested or well-versed in the scientific
While the abstract serves an organizational function for the academic genre, the academic language used serves as its style. As another convention found in this genre, the language used by the author (or authors) in a scientific journal article reflects the seriousness of the piece as well as its academic tone of voice. In the conclusion of “An epigenetic clock analysis of race/ethnicity, sex, and coronary heart disease,” the vocabulary, observable cause-and-effect, and the lack of bias in the tone convey the importance of language in academia, as aging rates between men and women are described as having both “…intrinsic…insignificant associations with well-studied risk factors of CHD…” and “…extrinsic aging rates [that] tend to have significant (but weak) associations with several pro-inflammatory risk factors” (GenomeBiology). From above, it can be inferred that the language is written for the sake of specificity towards an audience more interested in the presented material than the average reader. It is also important to note that language used reflects heavily on the authors’ knowledge in regards to terminology of the subject matter, as well as literary sophistication. If the specific language is not used in the academic article, critics and other researchers among the audience may or may not choose to accredit the article with varying degrees of ethos, or seriousness in consideration of scientific citation. Clearly, academic language is a crucial and necessary convention of scientific articles and, by extension, the academic genre.
The convention of backing up an article’s argument with experimental studies (preferably a multitude) adds credibility, or ethos to the article itself, and stabilizes its place in the academic genre. When a scientific article, or any piece of writing makes an argument or takes a stance on a position, it is of course necessary to add as much credibility through citation of primary and secondary sources, and either conduct a replicable experiment or cite other similar experiments that can reinforce the said argument. Like both articles in the recent PB1, “An epigenetic clock analysis of race/ethnicity, sex, and coronary heart disease” covers a variety of relevant studies conducted by the authors and their associates. Due to the many influential variables that affect the results, it is important for the researchers, as well as the users of the data, to not make many assumptions and not draw any immediate conclusions. In the study of salivary and blood samples among different cultures and ethnicities, the results of the conducted study were “…highly robust with respect to using the smaller or larger versions of the datasets,” while the authors had to acknowledge “…a potential for selection bias…” despite its presumed minimalism (GenomeBiology). Discrepancies such as these must be acknowledged along with the rest of the data obtained if - as stated in PB1 – the article is to be given enough credibility as a piece within the academic genre, as well as qualify as a significant and contributive scientific document.
These three commonalities are only a few of the many possible conventions that can potentially make-or-break an article in the scientific discipline of the academic genre. But with almost every genre, each convention serves as a whole to gain a favorable response among certain audiences. In the case of the science, the conventions serve as their own whole to inform and convince those skeptical among the audience, that the data and timely conclusions within both the article and study (or studies) are legitimate. For the authors (who are experts in their fields) who believe they have something to offer to the scientific community, they must be diligent in their displays of data and evidence, and work tirelessly to illustrate scientific concepts. Thus, specific guidelines (sometimes unwritten) must be followed in the form of conventions that help others confirm or disapprove work made for scientific progress in the academic genre.
Works Cited
Biomed Central, comp. "An Epigenetic Clock Analysis of Race/ethnicity, Sex, and Coronary Heart Disease." Genome Biology (2016): n. pag. Web. 23 Aug. 2016. <https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-016-1030-0>.